This is my favorite quote from one of my favorite movies, Good Will Hunting.
Chuckie: Are we gonna have a problem here?
Clark: No, no, no, no! There's no problem here. I was just hoping you might give me some insight into the evolution of the market economy in the southern colonies. My contention is that prior to the Revolutionary War, the economic modalities, especially in the southern colonies, could be most aptly described as agrarian precapitalist.
Chuckie: Let me tell you something -
Will: Of course that's your contention. You're a first-year grad student; you just got finished reading some Marxian historian, Pete Garrison probably. You're gonna be convinced of that 'till next month when you get to James Lemon. Then you're going to be talking about how the economies of Virginia and Pennsylvania were entrepreneurial and capitalist way back in 1740. That's gonna last until next year; you're gonna be in here regurgitating Gordon Wood, talkin' about, you know, the pre-revolutionary utopia and the capital-forming effects of military mobilization.
Clark: Well, as a matter of fact, I won't, because Wood drastically underestimates the impact of social -
Will: "Wood drastically underestimates the impact of social distinctions predicated upon wealth, especially inherited wealth"? You got that from Vickers' "Work in Essex County," page 98, right? Yeah, I read that too. Were you gonna plagiarize the whole thing for us? Do you have any thoughts of your own on this matter? Or do you, is that your thing, you come into a bar, read some obscure passage and then pretend - you pawn it off as your own, as your own idea just to impress some girls, embarrass my friend?
Clark: [looks down in shame]
Will: See, the sad thing about a guy like you is, in 50 years you're gonna start doin' some thinkin' on your own and you're going to come up with the fact that there are two certainties in life: one, don't do that, and two, you dropped 150 grand on a [explitive] education you could have got for a dollar fifty in late charges at the public library!
Clark: Yeah, but I will have a degree. And you'll be servin' my kids fries at a drive-thru on our way to a skiing trip.
Will: That may be, but at least I won't be unoriginal. But I mean, if you have a problem with that, I mean, we could just step outside - we could figure it out.
Clark: No, man, there's no problem. It's cool.
Will: It's cool?
Clark: Yeah.
Will: Cool.
Chuckie: [explitive] [explitive] right it's cool. How do you like me NOW?
Morgan: My boy's wicked smart!
I love this quote because it illustrates an important point. We spend tons of money on education only to regurgitate certain information, and thinking by oneself is often overlooked and never taught. I recently heard Tim Keller say that if you listen to/read one author/speaker, you will be a clone. If you listen to/read ten authors/speakers, you will begin to develop your own style. But, if you listen to/read two hundred authors/speakers, you will begin to have your own thoughts; however, you will always come back to those first few who really impacted you. I am really seeing this in my own life recently. I began my external Biblical reading with Piper. His rock solid exegesis helped lay the Biblical groundwork for my theology. If you talked to me a year or two ago, I probably sounded quite a bit like him. I am not saying sounding like him is a bad thing, but I sounded like him because I knew nothing else; I knew no other way of describing and relating the things he said. Then, I began reading and listening to things outside of Piper. I think I am probably at the fifty or sixty author/speaker mark right now, and I am starting to find my own way of thinking and forming thoughts. However, it is heavily reliant upon the authors whom I have read. I am not saying I skip the Text, but I am saying that the way I relate and contextualize the Text is shaped by many different factors.
So, I say all of that to say this: READ and LISTEN. Read variety, and listen to variety. I understand that people are incredibly busy, and many think they do not have time to listen to an hour sermon or read a five page article or tackle a lengthy book. Let me tell you, friend, if you are one of those people who thinks you are too busy to read and listen to the Bible and its exposition, then you are being deceived by Satan. I try my best to relay good information and links that I come across, and I hope you are able to benefit from them. Let me encourage you to find time in your schedule to read, write, and listen. Cut out the stupid box (TV), and pick up a book, an iPod, or a moleskine, and use your brain. Anyway, I will get off my soapbox now.
(*Please note that in all of this, I am assuming that you are engaged in a regular Bible reading program. Don't even think about reading a variety of authors unless you are in the Bible daily.)